Published on April 13, 2026
In Canadian criminal law, a person can be charged with an offence without having committed the principal crime. The notions of attempt, conspiracy and counselling allow the courts to sanction criminal behaviour from its very inception. At our firm, we regularly defend clients facing this type of charge. Understanding these distinctions is therefore essential to properly assess your situation. A consultation with a specialized lawyer can make all the difference.
Learn more
In criminal law, there are several ways to participate in the commission of a crime. It is not necessary to be the principal offender to be charged. Indeed, three notions come up frequently: attempt, conspiracy and counselling. Although they may seem similar, these offences are governed by distinct sections of the Criminal Code. Each responds to precise criteria.
Attempt
Provided for in section 24 of the Criminal Code, attempt applies to a person who intends to commit a crime. They must also take a concrete step toward achieving their goal. The crime does not need to be completed.
The essential elements
- Actus reus (the physical act) : there must be a commencement of the execution of the crime. Mere preparatory acts are not sufficient. Buying materials or making plans, for example, do not constitute an attempt.
- Mens rea (criminal intent) : the accused must have the specific intent to commit the offence. They must also act knowingly.
Certain offences, however, cannot be the subject of an attempt, notably :
- Conspiracy (s. 465 C.C.),
- Criminal harassment (s. 264(2)(a) and (b) C.C.),
- And manslaughter (s. 222(5) and 234 C.C.).
Conspiracy
Provided for in section 465 of the Criminal Code, conspiracy consists of an agreement with one or more persons to commit a crime. It is a standalone offence. It is complete as soon as the agreement is reached, even if the criminal plan is never carried out.
The essential elements
- Actus reus : an agreement between at least two persons with a view to committing a criminal act.
- The subsequent withdrawal of one of the participants does not erase the conspiracy.
- The fact that the crime is impossible to carry out is irrelevant. However, the planned offence must exist.
- Mens rea : a genuine intention to agree to carry out the criminal plan. Recklessness is not sufficient.
When a conspiracy results in the commission of the planned offence, the participants may be found to be parties to the offence. This also applies in the case of an attempt to commit the offence. This liability flows from sections 21(1)(c) and 21(2) C.C. It applies notably when they demonstrate an intention to assist one another in carrying out the illegal plan.
Counselling
Provided for in section 464 of the Criminal Code, counselling applies to a person who actively incites or encourages someone to commit a crime. This offence applies even if the crime is never carried out.
The essential elements
- Actus reus : taking an act of encouragement or incitement to commit a criminal offence.
- Mens rea : having the intention that the crime be committed. It is also sufficient to be aware of an unjustified risk that the counselling will lead to the commission of the crime.
If the crime is subsequently committed, the person who encouraged it becomes a party to the offence. This flows from section 22(1) C.C. Furthermore, section 22(2) C.C. provides that they may also be held responsible for incidental crimes. This includes crimes committed in the course of the commission of the counselled crime.
Conclusion
The distinction between attempt, conspiracy and counselling lies in two key elements. On one hand, the moment at which the offence arises. On the other hand, the role played by the accused in the criminal undertaking. Even in the absence of a completed crime, Canadian law punishes these behaviours. Indeed, they demonstrate criminal intent serious enough to threaten public order.
At our firm, we assist persons charged with these offences at every stage of the legal process. Contact us to obtain a defence tailored to your situation.